Will the public option make it in the Senate?

CNN says “It’s not clear whether the two Democrats [Chuck Schumer and Jay Rockefeller] have the votes on the [Finance] committee to get their amendments passed.”

A public option would be a government-funded, government-run health care option, similar to Medicare. Under the plan, people would pay premiums 10 to 20 percent less than private insurance.

What in the world is wrong with a 10-20% reduction in premiums through the public option? It is beyond me why anyone is opposed to the public option. That it may be labeled “socialized medicine” doesn’t cut any ice with me. Labels are irrelevant. The arguments that it would put federal bureaucrats between me and my doctor doesn’t cut it either. Insurance company bureaucrats would be worse because they’re in it for the money.

Related posts:

  1. Senator Grassley: Make sure there is no public option
  2. Senator Ensign voted against public option
  3. 65% of Americans favor public option
  4. We will regret failure of the public option
  5. Why there is no single-payer public option

About Featheriver

Born and raised in Oklahoma. Improved in California. Out to pasture in Nevada. Born in 1933, Korean War Vet in USAF. Occupation: Criminal Law and Torts. Retired California Lawyer. Now live in Pahrump, Nye County, Nevada.
This entry was posted in Politics, Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge